State of Nevada

The topic of discussion was Arizona’s SB 1070 bill that was approved to chuck out illegitimate migrants. The bill was seen to have affected the education sector since many high school students were forced to live without their parents.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on State of Nevada specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Their parents were forced to move to other states that do not have stern immigration policies. The participants talked about the impacts of the law to the Arizona youths and what could be done to reduce its impacts. The guests analyzed one of the current studies undertaken by a group of researchers from a local university. In the study, it is revealed that many young people were unwilling to give their views because of unknown reasons There were two participants in the debate that is, Devin Browne- the KJZZ reporter and Tomas Lopez the co-author of the recently performed study. Browne observed t hat although the tenets of the SB 1070 were not fully endorsed, its sanctioning caused societal disruptions. Many parents chose to move to other states without the law and left their children to continue with their studies. The proponents of the law believe that its passage would allow people to go back to their ancestral regions since illegal migration interferes with the financial system of a particular state. The panelists observed how the Arizona bill has been misinterpreted as a move to subjugate certain races. The bill in actual terms does not contravene the constitution since the US constitution permits states to establish regulations that guarantee normalcy as well as constancy (Frontani 217). The central government on its part has failed to educate people on the importance of such law, which has ended up rising tensions among different groups (McKnight 246). The government has actually failed to act as a unifying factor because it is inciting Americans against their fellow Americans.Advertising Looking for essay on government? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The Obama regime has failed to deliver its promises to the masses, which it had pledged during elections. The regime was initially perceived to be committed towards abolishing racial and ethnic discrimination (Cheryl 30). The Arizona law does not allow racial profiling but the media and the ruling elites have taken the opportunity to advance their interests as regards to racism (Anderson 140). Politicians are using the ongoing debate to frustrate supporters of their opponents or to seek votes (Hagan 671). As usual, politicians and the media will always ensure that the public follows their perspectives concerning major debates (Miller 21). The Arizona law is applicable since illegal immigration has caused more harm than good. Immigrants from time to time have been proved to be interfering with the labor market. They offer cheap labor, which d emoralizes the most qualified in society (Fawcett 56). Again, refugees are known to be smugglers. They bring in goods from their places of origin without paying custom duties. To the extreme end, they engage in illegal businesses such as trading in drugs and firearms (Baigent 239). Columbia and other states have lost their sovereignty to drug lords and criminals because they lack effective migration laws (Clinton 15). The American states near the border must constantly come up with strong policies aimed at containing illegal migration. Finally, the panelists were concerned with national security (White 100). Application of Arizona law is necessary for national interests because terrorists should not be given any chance of becoming citizens of a great nation like the US (Archibold 17). On a personal standpoint, the Arizona law should be implemented immediately. If Arizona does not continuously crackdown on illegal immigrants, it can be like Columbia where drug lords have taken over s tate powers and established their own administrative unit referred to as FARC (Archibold 4).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on State of Nevada specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Works Cited Anderson, Philip. â€Å"Introduction to Vilhelm Moberg’s ‘Why I Wrote the Novel about Swedish Emigrants'†. Swedish-American Historical Quarterly, Vol. 59, pp 137-144, 2008. Archibold, Randal. â€Å"Illegal immigrants slain in an attack in Arizona†. The New York Times, 26 May 2007. Print. Archibold, Randal. â€Å"Judge blocks Arizona’s immigration law†. New York Times, 17 October 2011. Print. Baigent, Elizabeth. â€Å"Swedish immigrants in McKeesport, Pennsylvania: Did the Great American Dream come true? Journal of Historical Geography, Vol. 26, Issue 2, pp 239-72, 2002. Cheryl, Sullivan. â€Å"US Cancels virtual fence'†. Christian Science Monitor, 17 May 2011. Online. Clinton, Will iam and Schwarzenegger, Arnold. â€Å"Beyond Payday Loans†. The Wall Street Journal, 2008. Fawcett, James and Carino, Benjamin. Pacific Bridges: The New Immigration from Asia and the Pacific Islands. New York, NY: Center for Migration Studies, 1987.Advertising Looking for essay on government? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Frontani, Michael. â€Å"From the Bottom to the Top’: Frank Sinatra, the American Myth of Success, and the Italian-American Image. Journal of American Culture, Vol. 28 Issue 2, pp 216-230,2005. Hagan, John and Palloni, Alberto. Sociological Criminology and the Mythology of Hispanic Immigration and Crime. Social Problems, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 617-632, 1999. McKnight, Roger. â€Å"Vilhelm Moberg, the Emigrant Novels, and their Changing Readers†. Swedish-American Historical Quarterly, Vol. 49 Issue 3, pp 245-256, July 1998. Miller, Debra. Illegal Immigration. New York, NY: Reference Point Press, 2007. White, Roa, â€Å"Emigration as Emancipation: Portrayals of the Immigrant Irish Girl in Nineteenth-Century Fiction. New Hibernia Review, spring Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp 95-108, 2005. This essay on State of Nevada was written and submitted by user K1m0ra to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.

Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. At 6:01 p.m. on April 4, 1968, Civil Rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was hit by a snipers bullet. King had been standing on the balcony in front of his room at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, when without warning, he was shot. The .30-caliber rifle bullet entered Kings right cheek, traveled through his neck, and finally stopped at his shoulder blade. King was immediately taken to a nearby hospital but was pronounced dead at 7:05 p.m. Violence and controversy followed. In outrage of the murder, many blacks took to the streets across the United States in a massive wave of riots. The FBI investigated the crime, but many believed them partially or fully responsible for the assassination. An escaped convict by the name of James Earl Ray was arrested, but many people,  including some of Martin Luther King Jr.s own family, believe he was innocent. What happened that evening? Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.    When Martin Luther King Jr.  emerged as the leader of the  Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1955, he began a long tenure as the spokesperson for nonviolent protest in the Civil Rights Movement. As a Baptist minister, he was a moral leader to the community. Plus, he was charismatic and had a powerful way of speaking. He was also a man of vision and determination. He never stopped dreaming of what could be. Yet he was a man, not a God. He was most often overworked and overtired and he had a fondness for the private company of women. Though he was the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize winner, he did not have complete control over the Civil Rights Movement. By 1968, violence had edged its way into the movement. Black Panther Party members carried loaded weapons, riots had erupted across the country, and numerous civil rights organizations had taken up the mantra Black Power! Yet Martin Luther King Jr. held strong to his beliefs, even as he saw the Civil Rights Movement being torn in two. Violence is what brought King back to Memphis in April 1968. Striking Sanitation Workers in Memphis On February 12, a total of 1,300  African-American sanitation workers in Memphis went on strike. Though there had been a long history of grievances, the strike began as a response to a January 31 incident in which 22 black sanitation workers were sent home without pay during bad weather while all the white workers remained on the job. When the City of Memphis refused to negotiate with the 1,300 striking workers, King and other civil rights leaders were asked to visit Memphis in support. On Monday, March 18, King managed to fit in a quick stop in Memphis, where he spoke to more than  15,000 who had gathered at Mason Temple. Ten days later, King arrived in Memphis to lead a march in support of the striking workers. Unfortunately, as King led the crowd, a few of the protesters got rowdy and smashed the windows of a storefront. The violence spread and soon countless others had taken up sticks and were breaking windows and looting stores. Police moved in to disperse the crowd. Some of the marchers threw stones at the police. The police responded with tear gas and nightsticks. At least one of the marchers was shot and killed. King was extremely distressed at the violence that had erupted in his own march and became determined not to let violence prevail. He scheduled another march in Memphis for April 8. On April 3, King arrived in Memphis a little later than planned because there had been a bomb threat for his flight before takeoff. That evening, King delivered his Ive Been to the Mountaintop speech to a relatively small crowd that had braved the bad weather to hear King speak. Kings thoughts were obviously on his mortality, for he discussed the plane threat as well as the time he had been stabbed. He concluded the speech with, Well, I dont know what will happen now; weve got some difficult days ahead. But it really doesnt matter with me now, because Ive been to the mountaintop. And I dont mind. Like anybody, I would like to live a long life - longevity has its place. But Im not concerned about that now. I just want to do Gods will. And Hes allowed me to go up to the mountain. And Ive looked over, and Ive seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people will get to the Promised Land. And so Im happy tonight; Im not worried about anything; Im not fearing any man. Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord. After the speech, King went back to the Lorraine Motel to rest. Martin Luther King Jr. Stands on the Lorraine Motel Balcony The Lorraine Motel (now the  National Civil Rights Museum) was a relatively drab, two-story motor inn on Mulberry Street in downtown Memphis. Yet it had become a habit of Martin Luther King and his entourage to stay at the Lorraine Motel when they visited Memphis. On the evening of April 4, 1968, Martin Luther King and his friends were getting dressed to have dinner with Memphis minister Billy Kyles. King was in room 306 on the second floor and hurried to get dressed since they were, as usual, running a bit late. While putting on his shirt and using Magic Shave Powder to shave, King chatted with Ralph Abernathy about an upcoming event. Around 5:30 p.m., Kyles  knocked on their door to hurry them along. The three men joked about what was to be served for dinner. King and Abernathy wanted to confirm that they were going to be served soul food and not something like filet mignon. About half an hour later, Kyles and King stepped out of the motel room onto the balcony (basically the outside walkway that connected all the motels second-story rooms). Abernathy had gone to his room to put on some cologne. Near the car in the parking lot directly below the balcony, waited  James Bevel, Chauncey Eskridge (SCLC lawyer), Jesse Jackson, Hosea Williams, Andrew Young, and Solomon Jones, Jr. (the driver of the loaned white Cadillac). A few remarks were exchanged between the men waiting below and Kyles and King. Jones remarked that King should get a topcoat since it might get cold later; King replied, O.K. Kyles was just a couple of steps down the stairs and Abernathy was still inside the motel room when the shot rang out. Some of the men initially thought it  was a car backfire, but others realized it was a rifle shot. King had fallen to the concrete floor of the balcony with a large, gaping wound covering his right jaw. Martin Luther King Jr. Shot Abernathy ran out of his room to see his dear friend fallen, laying in a puddle of blood. He held Kings head saying, Martin, its all right. Dont worry. This is Ralph. This is Ralph.* Kyles had gone into a motel room to call an ambulance while others encircled King. Marrell McCollough, an undercover Memphis police officer, grabbed a towel and tried to stop the flow of blood. Though King was unresponsive, he was still alive - but only barely. Within 15 minutes of the shot, Martin Luther King arrived at St. Josephs Hospital on a stretcher with an oxygen mask over his face. He had been hit by a .30-06 caliber rifle bullet that had entered his right jaw, then traveled through his neck, severing his spinal cord, and stopped in his shoulder blade. The doctors tried emergency surgery but the wound was too serious. Martin Luther King Jr. was pronounced dead at 7:05 p.m. He was 39 years old. Who Killed Martin Luther King Jr.? Despite many conspiracy theories questioning who was responsible for the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., most of the evidence points to a single shooter, James Earl Ray. On the morning of April 4, Ray used information from the televised news as well as from a newspaper to discover where King was staying in Memphis. Around 3:30 p.m., Ray, using the name John Willard, rented room 5B in Bessie Brewers run-down rooming house that was located across the street from the Lorraine Motel. Ray then visited the York Arms Company a few blocks away and purchased a pair of binoculars for $41.55 in cash. Returning to the rooming house, Ray readied himself in the communal bathroom, peering out the window, waiting for King to emerge from his hotel room. At 6:01 p.m., Ray shot King, mortally wounding him. Immediately after the shot, Ray quickly placed his rifle, binoculars, radio, and newspaper into a box and covered it with an old, green blanket. Then Ray hurriedly carried the bundle out of the bathroom, down the hall, and down to the first floor. Once outside, Ray dumped his package outside the Canipe Amusement Company and walked swiftly to his car. He then drove away in his white Ford Mustang, just before police arrived. While Ray was driving toward Mississippi, police were starting to put the pieces together. Nearly immediately, the mysterious green bundle was discovered as were several witnesses who had seen someone who they believed to be the new renter of 5B rushing out of the rooming house with the bundle. By comparing fingerprints found on items in the bundle, including those on the rife and binoculars, with those of known fugitives, the FBI discovered they were looking for James Earl Ray. After a two-month international manhunt, Ray was finally captured on June 8 at Londons Heathrow Airport. Ray pleaded guilty and was given a 99-year sentence in prison. Ray died in prison in 1998. * Ralph Abernathy as quoted in Gerald Posner, Killing the Dream  (New York: Random House, 1998) 31. Sources: Garrow, David J.  Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. New York: William Morrow, 1986. Posner, Gerald.  Killing the Dream: James Earl Ray and the Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr.  New York: Random House, 1998.

Authentic Journey Report Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words

Authentic Journey Report - Essay Example The core objective of the report is to present an analysis of my authentic leadership journey from my early childhood to date. The report illustrates on how a good number of leaders fall short in performance in their leadership position. The report also talks about how I developed the basic authentic leader qualities. The research included in this report demonstrated the important of value, self awareness, and motivations as the main models relevant for an authentic leader. The report has also analyzed some of the prevailing leadership theory. Those included in the report are the authentic leader theory and the charismatic leader theory. It has presented some critics in the discussed leadership theory. The report has concluded by analyzing my achievement as an authentic leader. In this section, the report has illustrated on the achievement I have acquired so far as an authentic leader. It has also talked about the shortcomings in my position as an authentic leader. Recommendation of the areas which requires improvement is addressed in the recommendation section. The report has suggested five main means of improving my characteristic as authentic leaders. The five main methods include; demonstration of leadership sight, demonstration of leadership initiative, important of leaders impacts to the subjects, and the need for leadership integrity. Introduction Background Over a few decades ago, there has emerged a new theory in management studies. The theory is labeled authentic leadership. Various authors claim that the principal components of authentic leadership are such as moral perspective, self-awareness and relational transparency. Self-certainty and self-knowledge are significant ingredients to the success of an authentic leader (Shamir and Eilam, 2005). The two attributes improves an individual communication skills which are essential components to an authentic leader. In addition to that, it has been contended that leaders who are authentic are always true to themselves and act according to their beliefs for purposes of achieving a common good (Levy & Bentley 2007). However, the above definition fails to acknowledge the fact that, just like authenticity, truth is a concept that is contestable. Thus, it is important to acknowledge what authentic leadership really means. Authentic leadership is founded on the belief that a confident and resolute stance in an individual action and speech is a crucial indicator of a powerful (strong) leadership. On the contrary, theories revolving around leadership such as self are never recognized as neutral. This is because they are often experienced within the systems of authority. Therefore, authentic leadership is perceived to be an example of a privileged discourse that has its roots from a self-worth belief that is intrinsic in nature. For instance, in the western societies, a variety of leadership are more acknowledged than others. In that case, an individual that is self made is conceived as the epitome of the mighty and successful leader. It is often common to read about a person who had the capability to succeed through absolute wheel power. Nevertheless, each and every single individual needs moral support or motivation from others for purposes of achieving his or her goals. In addition to that, the success of a leader is always weighed depending on how well he or she has attained corporate goals (Arendt 1958). However, since actions are unpredictable in nature, an individual cannot have the